Charlesworth has begun, with article e459 published May 23, 2007, to tag gene sequences in the XML with the <named-content content-type="gene"></named-content> tag.
Topaz is rendering these in the HTML as: <span class="capture-id"></span>. At the moment, there is no style definied for capture-id, but I imagine Topaz has put it in as a placeholder for something we might do in the future.
Perhaps one of the first things we can do is to use this somehow to control the problem that we are having with lengthy gene sequences not wrapping. Here is some background on this problem:
DNA sequences listed in a paper are often lengthy, as in this example from PLoS ONE:
http://www.plosone.org/doi/pone.0000299#s4
ATGACTGAGACCCTCCCACCCGTGACTGAAAGCGCCGTCGCTCTGCAAGCAGAGGTTACCCAGCGGGAGCTGTTCGAGTTCGTCCTCAACGACCCCCTCCTGGCTTCTAGCCTCTACATCAACATTGCTCTGGCAGGCCTGTCTATACTGCTGTTCGTCTTCATGACCAGGGGACTCGATGACCCTAGGGCTAAACTGATTGCAGTGAGCACAATTCTGGTTCCCGTGGTCTCTATCGCTTCCTACACTGGGCTGGCATCTGGTCTCACAATCAGTGTCCTGGAAATGCCAGCTGGCCACTTTGCCGAAGGGAGTTCTGTCATGCTGGGAGGCGAAGAGGTCGATGGGGTTGTCACAATGTGGGGTCGCTACCTCACCTGGGCTCTCAGTACCCCCATGATCCTGCTGGCACTCGGACTCCTGGCCGGAAGTAACGCCACCAAACTCTTCACTGCTATTACATTCGATATCGCCATGTGCGTGACCGGGCTCGCAGCTGCCCTCACCACCAGCAGCCATCTGATGAGATGGTTTTGGTATGCCATCTCTTGTGCCTGCTTTCTGGTGGTGCTGTATATCCTGCTGGTGGAGTGGGCTCAGGATGCCAAGGCTGCAGGGACAGCCGACATGTTTAATACACTGAAGCTGCTCACTGTGGTGATGTGGCTGGGTTACCCTATCGTTTGGGCACTCGGCGTGGAGGGAATCGCAGTTCTGCCTGTTGGTGTGACAAGCTGGGGCTACTCCTTCCTGGACATTGTGGCCAAGTATATTTTTGCCTTTCTGCTGCTGAATTATCTGACTTCCAATGAGTCCGTGGTGTCCGGCTCCATACTGGACGTGCCATCCGCCAGCGGCACACCTGCCGATGACTGA
The string of letters is not wrapping at the end of the line, it just extends off to edge of the screen, behind other layers.
In other PLoS journals, our vendor has resolved this in the HTML display by placing a <wbr alt="&8203;" style="content: attr(alt);" /> after every five characters in the string, for example:
http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040366#toclink4
From a semantic perspective, this is a bad solution. Do you have a better one?